<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK scientist disproves global warming skeptics&#8217; theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/07/11/uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/07/11/uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory</link>
	<description>Going green doesn&#039;t have to be complicated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarun K Juyal</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/07/11/uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-22244</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarun K Juyal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/07/11/uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory/#comment-22244</guid>
		<description>I am a regular reader of your article.  And I am very impress with your blog upon Global Warming. Now I am also write a blog upon &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifeofearth.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Global Warming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. This blog is collection of news &amp; reviews like the study found that global warming since 1985 has been caused neither by an increase in solar radiation nor by a decrease in the flux of galactic cosmic rays. Some researchers had also suggested that the latter might influence global warming because the rays trigger cloud formation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a regular reader of your article.  And I am very impress with your blog upon Global Warming. Now I am also write a blog upon <b><a href="http://www.lifeofearth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Global Warming</a></b>. This blog is collection of news &amp; reviews like the study found that global warming since 1985 has been caused neither by an increase in solar radiation nor by a decrease in the flux of galactic cosmic rays. Some researchers had also suggested that the latter might influence global warming because the rays trigger cloud formation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/07/11/uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-20124</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/07/11/uk-scientist-disproves-global-warming-skeptics-theory/#comment-20124</guid>
		<description>The sun has noeffect on our climate. This has been dealt with and the debate is over.
What we need is a world government body, like the United Nations, who can control and regulate all of our energy use and our scientific inquiry.
The truth will win in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sun has noeffect on our climate. This has been dealt with and the debate is over.</p>
<p>What we need is a world government body, like the United Nations, who can control and regulate all of our energy use and our scientific inquiry. </p>
<p>The truth will win in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

