<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News: Trees cause global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming</link>
	<description>Going green doesn&#039;t have to be complicated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siberian tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-2/#comment-69984</link>
		<dc:creator>Siberian tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-69984</guid>
		<description>Many people think that trees take carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. This is wrong, the trees during the day takes carbon dioxide and produce oxygen, and the night takes oxygen and produces carbon dioxide. Fortunately the day is longer than night, trees produce more oxygen than carbon dioxide.
.-= Siberian tiger&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://siberiantiger1.blogspot.com/2010/04/russia-iran-re-population-project.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Russia-Iran Re-population project&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people think that trees take carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. This is wrong, the trees during the day takes carbon dioxide and produce oxygen, and the night takes oxygen and produces carbon dioxide. Fortunately the day is longer than night, trees produce more oxygen than carbon dioxide.<br />
.-= Siberian tiger&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://siberiantiger1.blogspot.com/2010/04/russia-iran-re-population-project.html" rel="nofollow">Russia-Iran Re-population project</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panel</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-2/#comment-69526</link>
		<dc:creator>panel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-69526</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. You still have to take the 240v that comes out of the microinverter and transform/rectify it to charging voltage for the batteries. So the microinverter just adds another 8% loss to the system, compared to a DC-out MPTT controller like FlexMax 80. Also, much of Andalay&#039;s propaganda is bogus -- nobody in their right mind has 600 VDC wiring, shadows on one panel don&#039;t affect the output of other panels, etc.  Yeah, this system makes sense if all you want to do is pretend to sell electricity back to the grid (note: they might buy it, but it doesn&#039;t really go anywhere except into heat at the first transformer), but if you actually want to USE the generated electricity, a conventional system is much more efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. You still have to take the 240v that comes out of the microinverter and transform/rectify it to charging voltage for the batteries. So the microinverter just adds another 8% loss to the system, compared to a DC-out MPTT controller like FlexMax 80. Also, much of Andalay&#8217;s propaganda is bogus &#8212; nobody in their right mind has 600 VDC wiring, shadows on one panel don&#8217;t affect the output of other panels, etc.  Yeah, this system makes sense if all you want to do is pretend to sell electricity back to the grid (note: they might buy it, but it doesn&#8217;t really go anywhere except into heat at the first transformer), but if you actually want to USE the generated electricity, a conventional system is much more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-2/#comment-69458</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-69458</guid>
		<description>There are much warmer periods in the Earth&#039;s history than now. It&#039;s actually pretty cool now. Also, on a global time-scale, CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is historically low.
Don&#039;t be scared to death!
We need to do what we can for the environment: don&#039;t pollute, don&#039;t poison, don&#039;t waste, don&#039;t overfish, replant, recycle, filter and purify, desalinate, protect what&#039;s endangered, find and use alternatives to fossil fuels (mostly because they will run out), but mostly - CALM THE #@$% DOWN!
Trying to make people feel miserable for existing is not going to change a climate cycle that is bigger than we are - especially one we do not understand.
ALL extremes are bad - whichever side uses them.
WAKE UP and use your own mind! Use credible research by scientists who are NOT getting rich off of something. Don&#039;t be sheep!
BTW - Water Vapor IS a gas - just like CO2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are much warmer periods in the Earth&#8217;s history than now. It&#8217;s actually pretty cool now. Also, on a global time-scale, CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is historically low. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be scared to death! </p>
<p>We need to do what we can for the environment: don&#8217;t pollute, don&#8217;t poison, don&#8217;t waste, don&#8217;t overfish, replant, recycle, filter and purify, desalinate, protect what&#8217;s endangered, find and use alternatives to fossil fuels (mostly because they will run out), but mostly &#8211; CALM THE #@$% DOWN!</p>
<p>Trying to make people feel miserable for existing is not going to change a climate cycle that is bigger than we are &#8211; especially one we do not understand.</p>
<p>ALL extremes are bad &#8211; whichever side uses them. </p>
<p>WAKE UP and use your own mind! Use credible research by scientists who are NOT getting rich off of something. Don&#8217;t be sheep!</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Water Vapor IS a gas &#8211; just like CO2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-2/#comment-69341</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-69341</guid>
		<description>Global warming is a crock of garbage.  Lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is a crock of garbage.  Lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devon</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-2/#comment-69112</link>
		<dc:creator>devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 03:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-69112</guid>
		<description>Robert,
I can tell you are quite the scientist.  Are you familiar with equilibrium? Probably not.  If you have too much water vapor, it forms what we call clouds.  When you get too much moisture in the air, it condenses and falls back down to the earth.  It has nothing to do with &quot;cooling&quot;.  But you keep going with them scientific principles you know so well. idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, </p>
<p>I can tell you are quite the scientist.  Are you familiar with equilibrium? Probably not.  If you have too much water vapor, it forms what we call clouds.  When you get too much moisture in the air, it condenses and falls back down to the earth.  It has nothing to do with &#8220;cooling&#8221;.  But you keep going with them scientific principles you know so well. idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-2/#comment-68792</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-68792</guid>
		<description>To Devon Cayer:
LOL, I stopped reading your post when you said &quot;water vapor warms and condenses you morons&quot;.
When you warm water, it evaporates into water vapor. When this vapor is COOLED, it condenses back into liquid water.
Please do not start a thousand word reply with a scientific fallacy. It is a waste of time because it removes all credibility from the rest of your post, thus wasting everyone&#039;s time.
PLEASE CHECK YOUR FACTS AND SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPALS BEFORE CHALLENGING SOMEONE.
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Devon Cayer:</p>
<p>LOL, I stopped reading your post when you said &#8220;water vapor warms and condenses you morons&#8221;.</p>
<p>When you warm water, it evaporates into water vapor. When this vapor is COOLED, it condenses back into liquid water.</p>
<p>Please do not start a thousand word reply with a scientific fallacy. It is a waste of time because it removes all credibility from the rest of your post, thus wasting everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
<p>PLEASE CHECK YOUR FACTS AND SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPALS BEFORE CHALLENGING SOMEONE. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-68791</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-68791</guid>
		<description>Trees release water vapor. Water vapor is both the most plentiful and most efficiently heat-trapping of the greenhouse gases.
Water vapor nearly completely overlaps CO2 in it&#039;s energy absorption spectrum.
There are more trees in north america now than when we came here. You can only plant 3 trees for every one you cut down for so long before we&#039;ve replaced what we&#039;ve taken. Temp trends in the northern hemisphere show a net COOLING as we get more trees and their water vapor concentration blocks more of the suns radiation, thus we cool.
In the southern hemisphere, we&#039;ve taken more trees than put back thanks to the destruction of the largest forests on earth, the rain forest. As they reduce their trees, they have less water vapor. Data shows that in the same period NA is cooling from more water vapor caused by more trees, the southern hemisphere is WARMING and getting drier.
So, trees don&#039;t actually cause global warming, but their ABSENCE does. But, this is up to a point. We plant or save too many, we&#039;ll enter a new ice age. Remove too many, we&#039;ll have global warming and drought.
You won&#039;t hear any scientists on the news talking about this because:
THEY WOULD BE CRUCIFIED BY THE LEFTIST GREEN WARRIOR ECO-TERRORISTS FOR NOT GETTING ON THE CARBON BANDWAGON. NO ONE WANTS TO ADMIT THAT SOMETHING WARM AND FUZZY LIKE BEAUTIFUL TREES COULD BE DESTROYING OUR ATMOSPHERE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trees release water vapor. Water vapor is both the most plentiful and most efficiently heat-trapping of the greenhouse gases.</p>
<p>Water vapor nearly completely overlaps CO2 in it&#8217;s energy absorption spectrum.</p>
<p>There are more trees in north america now than when we came here. You can only plant 3 trees for every one you cut down for so long before we&#8217;ve replaced what we&#8217;ve taken. Temp trends in the northern hemisphere show a net COOLING as we get more trees and their water vapor concentration blocks more of the suns radiation, thus we cool.</p>
<p>In the southern hemisphere, we&#8217;ve taken more trees than put back thanks to the destruction of the largest forests on earth, the rain forest. As they reduce their trees, they have less water vapor. Data shows that in the same period NA is cooling from more water vapor caused by more trees, the southern hemisphere is WARMING and getting drier. </p>
<p>So, trees don&#8217;t actually cause global warming, but their ABSENCE does. But, this is up to a point. We plant or save too many, we&#8217;ll enter a new ice age. Remove too many, we&#8217;ll have global warming and drought.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t hear any scientists on the news talking about this because:</p>
<p>THEY WOULD BE CRUCIFIED BY THE LEFTIST GREEN WARRIOR ECO-TERRORISTS FOR NOT GETTING ON THE CARBON BANDWAGON. NO ONE WANTS TO ADMIT THAT SOMETHING WARM AND FUZZY LIKE BEAUTIFUL TREES COULD BE DESTROYING OUR ATMOSPHERE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-68527</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-68527</guid>
		<description>May God (or any other entity) save us all if the previous commentors have been educated in the American school system!  Your Friend, Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May God (or any other entity) save us all if the previous commentors have been educated in the American school system!  Your Friend, Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-68273</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-68273</guid>
		<description>Reflection on the global warming.
Unchecked pollution, and if nothing is done soon, it will be too late to take steps to slow global warming, because it will come to such a degree that the warming will no longer view point of return and that alone will happen in the coming decades. It is said that in this century global temperature of the Earth will increase from 1 to 6 degrees, perhaps nothing does not seem at first glance. But increased by grade level will bring very drastic consequences. When the ground reaches 3rd level of increase will no longer be able to do anything, because the warming is going to turn uncontrollable and lead to the disappearance of the Amazon because of huge fires that are going to be impossible to stop, that is very serious because automatically cause the temperature rises 1 or 2 degrees. And well the 4th grade, sea level rise due to melting of the poles of Antarctica, disappearing all countries with coasts, or that costs will be the South American 1eras seriously affected. Apart melting in Antarctica today is already a reality. This happening in a more accelerated what was predicted. The volume containing all bodies of ice existing in the planet, could cause the sea level rose from 60 to 70 m! It is going to see supertormentas never before seen, and this enormous disaster will happen much sooner than we think, maybe even what we live, but so are our children. These are some of the innumerable consequences that will bring climate change and indeed perhaps there are many other things that neither we, nor imagine that they can get to happen. Climate change and what we are living. Major natural disasters that occurred before each decades, now increasingly occur more often. These phenomena occur with ever more frequency and intensity. The shedding of large blocks of ice is occurring in at the poles, ice masses giants hundred km. square. While the release of those blocks that collapse will not have an effect on sea level rise, it means a warning that something is not amiss, because those such landslides are not unusual, it is because of global warming as scientists point out . And that is the area most affected by warming, and Antarctica is the area that suffered most to the increase in temperature. Obviously this planet we say that this reaches its limit, and this warning us. We are in an era in which we must take proper account of the environment and learn to survive what we are going to face, which will be a very tough battle for survival, not because we are going to cheat, little is going to do for this issue, or when actually find a solution because it will be too late. And the underdeveloped countries will suffer the greatest impact. This would cause enormous global crises in the economic and human losses. Wars over scarce natural resources, and one of the main causes is by water scarcity. It is very difficult, because we must change the mentality of people, change our ways of living, and that is not an overnight. And there are other interests through playing, the profit motive and expansion of the 1st world countries and those of developing countries, affecting more even look for new alternatives that are eco-development, such an alternative is solar and wind energy but also other possibilities exist. So it is very difficult to change a system already dominant globally that governs our society. Otherwise we can perhaps say that the big culprit is the capitalist system, but speaking from the stage of industrial development. The industries are deriving the large percentage of greenhouse gases that harm the environment. But we think that is going to do much more for this cause and that the man be convinced that there is no other if we want our preservation. Man is an animal usual for that side emerges perhaps some hope, but we do not have much time. We must seek solutions to prevent such predictions of climatic disasters that do not occur and not seek solutions to face them in tomorrow. Prevention is better than cure fits very well in this issue. And I think one thing is certain the economic cost would be greatly enhanced if we continue at the same rants, which means cities rebuild depleted by natural disasters that actually happens but will become somewhat more common and more destructive power, possible new diseases that may occur, the scarcity of resources would make certain that these were of very high cost to achieve them, and this is very clear, not everyone can access them, will be very few, there will be wars over them, and good due to the increased level Sea, countries with fewer resources can not be saved. And the richest countries seek solutions to build, blocks species barrier wall to prevent giants are under water. What is an injustice because perhaps they can save a few, those with more resources and are more powerful, which in turn are those that pollute more. Can you imagine what could become the economic cost? would be astronomical figures, but most importantly
certainly is the human cost that this will cause. No doubt that this education will be key, since the institutes and households. It is time to really know and act. It can no longer be ignored, but details more details, climate change is a reality and is largely due to the action of man, so I have no doubt. I believe that the climate undergoes natural changes but I think that man has accelerated this process. But apart think this, what do we leave them to those who come to future generations and other living things? Many people think that perhaps this might happen, but you downplay because they think that they will play in their lives or who will move in a long time, but as I said earlier, with those who will come? Suffered the consequences of what they did their predecessors.
Then I will say more in detail which can cause increased by grade level according to Mark Lynas in a book he wrote entitled &quot;Six Degrees&quot; (six degrees).
A degree more: it would remove the arctic ice.
Lynas raises the disappearance of arctic ice for half a year if the temperature rises one degree centigrade. In addition, the tides could submerge all houses on the coast of the Bay of Bengal, between Burma and India, where inhabit more than one million people. It would have hurricanes in the South Atlanta, severe droughts in the western United States are located where cities like San Diego, San Francisco, Las Vegas and Los Angeles and would be unexpected changes in farming in England, where there are over 400 wineries.
Over 2 degrees: No more barriers reefs.
It would accelerate the melting of glaciers of Greenland. The Jakobshavn Glacier would follow that if portions of ice melts would be sufficient to supply drinking water to all residents of New York for one year. The extinction of polar bears would not be going back and insects could begin to migrate to many regions that have become more temperate, a fact that is already evident in parts of Brazil, Venezuela and Colombia. The island nation of Tuvalu in the South Pacific, could be submerged by tidal barriers and reefs disappear, because not stand the increase in water temperature.
Over 3 degrees: the threat would fall on the Amazon jungle
The snow will end up in the Alps and heat waves would be the norm in the Mediterranean and in the middle of Central Europe. The hurricanes of Category 6, worse than Katrina, would be more frequent and the Amazon jungle could disappear by the spread of fires.
More 4 degrees: Venice would disappear and part of Egypt. The melting of glaciers in the Himalayas, which feed the Ganges River, would occur before 2035. The floods are frequent. In addition, it produces water without snow, there would be famine. The northern Canada became the most prolific agricultural area of the planet and ice in western Antarctica could collapse by raising the sea level until the destruction of coastal areas of americas America. It was also completely flood Venice (Italy) and areas of Egypt and Bangladesh.
Over 5 degrees: there would be no water for Los Angeles, Cairo, Lima or Mumbai.
Faced with such a scenario, the war in the liquid would be imminent, a situation that many of the world&#039;s experts have announced.
Over 6 degrees: we returned to Cretaceous period.
For lack of nutrients, and to the extinction of more than 70 percent of species, the ocean would be bright blue. Deserts advance on the continents. The disaster would be a matter of every day and many major world cities, like New York would be underwater. The world could resemble the Cretaceous period, 144 million years ago, in which only 18 per cent of the Earth&#039;s surface was on the water level, that figure today is close to 30 percent.
I am convinced and I firmly believe in this. I also believe that this century will be key because it will mark the course of humanity. I think we are at the right time to change or condemn us to extinction.
Let me that I accept and respect for people who disagree, only express my thoughts.
This simply is aimed to inform and raise awareness.
I know that not long ago, that really what is the action would cause changes, but the information is also very important, awareness is the 1st step.
Of course I want to make something more but so far as not.
At the moment I&#039;m finishing secondary. Then I want to do and then make meteorology degree in atmospheric science. Because I&#039;m interested in studying the behavior and climate variability and the consequences that brings so much and can bring climate change.
If someone wants to contact me, or if I can advise that I have all options for further study of atmospheric sciences, my mail is: locomotiv313@hotmail.com
Since I already thank you very much for this blog for giving me the opportunity to leave this message and so many others.
I take to communicate across these blogs dealing with the issue of climate change or global warming because the people who visit is more likely to be interested in this topic.
Thank you very much.
A big greeting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reflection on the global warming. </p>
<p>Unchecked pollution, and if nothing is done soon, it will be too late to take steps to slow global warming, because it will come to such a degree that the warming will no longer view point of return and that alone will happen in the coming decades. It is said that in this century global temperature of the Earth will increase from 1 to 6 degrees, perhaps nothing does not seem at first glance. But increased by grade level will bring very drastic consequences. When the ground reaches 3rd level of increase will no longer be able to do anything, because the warming is going to turn uncontrollable and lead to the disappearance of the Amazon because of huge fires that are going to be impossible to stop, that is very serious because automatically cause the temperature rises 1 or 2 degrees. And well the 4th grade, sea level rise due to melting of the poles of Antarctica, disappearing all countries with coasts, or that costs will be the South American 1eras seriously affected. Apart melting in Antarctica today is already a reality. This happening in a more accelerated what was predicted. The volume containing all bodies of ice existing in the planet, could cause the sea level rose from 60 to 70 m! It is going to see supertormentas never before seen, and this enormous disaster will happen much sooner than we think, maybe even what we live, but so are our children. These are some of the innumerable consequences that will bring climate change and indeed perhaps there are many other things that neither we, nor imagine that they can get to happen. Climate change and what we are living. Major natural disasters that occurred before each decades, now increasingly occur more often. These phenomena occur with ever more frequency and intensity. The shedding of large blocks of ice is occurring in at the poles, ice masses giants hundred km. square. While the release of those blocks that collapse will not have an effect on sea level rise, it means a warning that something is not amiss, because those such landslides are not unusual, it is because of global warming as scientists point out . And that is the area most affected by warming, and Antarctica is the area that suffered most to the increase in temperature. Obviously this planet we say that this reaches its limit, and this warning us. We are in an era in which we must take proper account of the environment and learn to survive what we are going to face, which will be a very tough battle for survival, not because we are going to cheat, little is going to do for this issue, or when actually find a solution because it will be too late. And the underdeveloped countries will suffer the greatest impact. This would cause enormous global crises in the economic and human losses. Wars over scarce natural resources, and one of the main causes is by water scarcity. It is very difficult, because we must change the mentality of people, change our ways of living, and that is not an overnight. And there are other interests through playing, the profit motive and expansion of the 1st world countries and those of developing countries, affecting more even look for new alternatives that are eco-development, such an alternative is solar and wind energy but also other possibilities exist. So it is very difficult to change a system already dominant globally that governs our society. Otherwise we can perhaps say that the big culprit is the capitalist system, but speaking from the stage of industrial development. The industries are deriving the large percentage of greenhouse gases that harm the environment. But we think that is going to do much more for this cause and that the man be convinced that there is no other if we want our preservation. Man is an animal usual for that side emerges perhaps some hope, but we do not have much time. We must seek solutions to prevent such predictions of climatic disasters that do not occur and not seek solutions to face them in tomorrow. Prevention is better than cure fits very well in this issue. And I think one thing is certain the economic cost would be greatly enhanced if we continue at the same rants, which means cities rebuild depleted by natural disasters that actually happens but will become somewhat more common and more destructive power, possible new diseases that may occur, the scarcity of resources would make certain that these were of very high cost to achieve them, and this is very clear, not everyone can access them, will be very few, there will be wars over them, and good due to the increased level Sea, countries with fewer resources can not be saved. And the richest countries seek solutions to build, blocks species barrier wall to prevent giants are under water. What is an injustice because perhaps they can save a few, those with more resources and are more powerful, which in turn are those that pollute more. Can you imagine what could become the economic cost? would be astronomical figures, but most importantly<br />
certainly is the human cost that this will cause. No doubt that this education will be key, since the institutes and households. It is time to really know and act. It can no longer be ignored, but details more details, climate change is a reality and is largely due to the action of man, so I have no doubt. I believe that the climate undergoes natural changes but I think that man has accelerated this process. But apart think this, what do we leave them to those who come to future generations and other living things? Many people think that perhaps this might happen, but you downplay because they think that they will play in their lives or who will move in a long time, but as I said earlier, with those who will come? Suffered the consequences of what they did their predecessors.<br />
Then I will say more in detail which can cause increased by grade level according to Mark Lynas in a book he wrote entitled &#8220;Six Degrees&#8221; (six degrees).<br />
A degree more: it would remove the arctic ice.<br />
Lynas raises the disappearance of arctic ice for half a year if the temperature rises one degree centigrade. In addition, the tides could submerge all houses on the coast of the Bay of Bengal, between Burma and India, where inhabit more than one million people. It would have hurricanes in the South Atlanta, severe droughts in the western United States are located where cities like San Diego, San Francisco, Las Vegas and Los Angeles and would be unexpected changes in farming in England, where there are over 400 wineries.<br />
Over 2 degrees: No more barriers reefs.<br />
It would accelerate the melting of glaciers of Greenland. The Jakobshavn Glacier would follow that if portions of ice melts would be sufficient to supply drinking water to all residents of New York for one year. The extinction of polar bears would not be going back and insects could begin to migrate to many regions that have become more temperate, a fact that is already evident in parts of Brazil, Venezuela and Colombia. The island nation of Tuvalu in the South Pacific, could be submerged by tidal barriers and reefs disappear, because not stand the increase in water temperature.<br />
Over 3 degrees: the threat would fall on the Amazon jungle<br />
The snow will end up in the Alps and heat waves would be the norm in the Mediterranean and in the middle of Central Europe. The hurricanes of Category 6, worse than Katrina, would be more frequent and the Amazon jungle could disappear by the spread of fires.<br />
More 4 degrees: Venice would disappear and part of Egypt. The melting of glaciers in the Himalayas, which feed the Ganges River, would occur before 2035. The floods are frequent. In addition, it produces water without snow, there would be famine. The northern Canada became the most prolific agricultural area of the planet and ice in western Antarctica could collapse by raising the sea level until the destruction of coastal areas of americas America. It was also completely flood Venice (Italy) and areas of Egypt and Bangladesh.<br />
Over 5 degrees: there would be no water for Los Angeles, Cairo, Lima or Mumbai.<br />
Faced with such a scenario, the war in the liquid would be imminent, a situation that many of the world&#8217;s experts have announced.<br />
Over 6 degrees: we returned to Cretaceous period.<br />
For lack of nutrients, and to the extinction of more than 70 percent of species, the ocean would be bright blue. Deserts advance on the continents. The disaster would be a matter of every day and many major world cities, like New York would be underwater. The world could resemble the Cretaceous period, 144 million years ago, in which only 18 per cent of the Earth&#8217;s surface was on the water level, that figure today is close to 30 percent.<br />
I am convinced and I firmly believe in this. I also believe that this century will be key because it will mark the course of humanity. I think we are at the right time to change or condemn us to extinction.<br />
Let me that I accept and respect for people who disagree, only express my thoughts.<br />
This simply is aimed to inform and raise awareness.<br />
I know that not long ago, that really what is the action would cause changes, but the information is also very important, awareness is the 1st step.<br />
Of course I want to make something more but so far as not.<br />
At the moment I&#8217;m finishing secondary. Then I want to do and then make meteorology degree in atmospheric science. Because I&#8217;m interested in studying the behavior and climate variability and the consequences that brings so much and can bring climate change.<br />
If someone wants to contact me, or if I can advise that I have all options for further study of atmospheric sciences, my mail is: <a href="mailto:locomotiv313@hotmail.com">locomotiv313@hotmail.com</a><br />
Since I already thank you very much for this blog for giving me the opportunity to leave this message and so many others.<br />
I take to communicate across these blogs dealing with the issue of climate change or global warming because the people who visit is more likely to be interested in this topic.<br />
Thank you very much.<br />
A big greeting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denier</title>
		<link>http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-68267</link>
		<dc:creator>Denier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecostreet.com/blog/climate-change/2007/09/05/fox-news-trees-cause-global-warming/#comment-68267</guid>
		<description>Aside from the fact that anyone with an ounce of common sense can see what a pile of crap &quot;man made global warming&quot; is... what is your beef with Fox reporting this?  They report everything, they&#039;re a 24 hour news channel!!!  I suspect that even the whacked out liberal 3 networks and the other cable news channels reported this as well.  I know the far left Associated Press has run the story.
Anyway, the really funny part is that Shep Smith (the host of Fox&#039;s hard news program &quot;The Fox Report&quot; as well as Studio B, and featured in your clip above, is a brainwashed global warming zombie who is on YOUR environut side!  Hahaha, seriously!!!  He ridiculous those of us who see that global warming is nonsense regularly because he&#039;s a sheep like the rest of you.  Please choose your target more wisely next time.
And once again, this was a story out on the wires geniuses not &quot;Fox News&quot; making this claim.  Your very headline is dishonest, but luckily, your entire life is about being dishonest, which is why all of your friends link here using similarly dishonest headlines and you all have a big smug fest in your Priuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the fact that anyone with an ounce of common sense can see what a pile of crap &#8220;man made global warming&#8221; is&#8230; what is your beef with Fox reporting this?  They report everything, they&#8217;re a 24 hour news channel!!!  I suspect that even the whacked out liberal 3 networks and the other cable news channels reported this as well.  I know the far left Associated Press has run the story.</p>
<p>Anyway, the really funny part is that Shep Smith (the host of Fox&#8217;s hard news program &#8220;The Fox Report&#8221; as well as Studio B, and featured in your clip above, is a brainwashed global warming zombie who is on YOUR environut side!  Hahaha, seriously!!!  He ridiculous those of us who see that global warming is nonsense regularly because he&#8217;s a sheep like the rest of you.  Please choose your target more wisely next time.</p>
<p>And once again, this was a story out on the wires geniuses not &#8220;Fox News&#8221; making this claim.  Your very headline is dishonest, but luckily, your entire life is about being dishonest, which is why all of your friends link here using similarly dishonest headlines and you all have a big smug fest in your Priuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

